Do it is thought by you is better for students to the office before their university study?
MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, easier to write, better to read.
PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, face to face skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..
PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, opportunity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students can change their advanced schooling course while at uni….
Lots of people believe that it is simpler to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree?
Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has several benefits
Elements of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not dependant on others
more aged way, more responsible
No laggards
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Some people believe that children must do organised activities within their leisure time although some think that children should be able to do what they need to do inside their spare time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your brain wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it will be unfair to the minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to get
-furthermore studies show that the mind operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as for example studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many people say that globalisation and the growing wide range of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the surroundings. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your answer. From what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your situation.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP Gulf of Mexico, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…
Scientists genuinely believe that to be able to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy within their lives that are daily. However, a lot of people never have changed the way they live. Why do you might think many people never have taken action that is individual? What might be done to cause them to become take action?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy associated with the commons
– Collective problem – better to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What could possibly be done to encourage them to take action?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……
Some believe that is the responsibility of men and women to take care of the surroundings. Others say this is the national government which should be careful regarding the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Paragraph 1
People should care for environmental surroundings because:
Our company is the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become how to write papers in college considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Paragraph 2
Government should take care of the surroundings because:
They have the power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
allowed to be guardians of the country, which means collectively these are typically guardians regarding the earth… yet not true in fact
Conclusion
Both should really be doing more!
In a lot of countries small shops and town centers ‘re going out of business, because individuals have a tendency to drive into the large stores that are out-of-town. This leads to an increase in car use, plus it ensures that people without cars don’t have a lot of usage of out-of-town stores. Do you consider features of such development outweigh its disadvantages?